On September 16th
Forbes
magazine released the annual Forbes 400 list of billionaires. The
“Facts and Figures” article by Luisa Kroll dissects the report
and summarizes the methodology used to collect the data.
The highlights are listed
first, Bill Gates is once again the richest in the world and Mark
Zuckerberg has made it back to the top 20. “The
400 wealthiest Americans are worth just over $2 trillion, roughly
equivalent to the GDP of Russia. That is a gain of $300 billion
from a year ago, and more than double a decade ago. The average net
worth of list members is a staggering $5 billion, $800 million more
than a year ago and also a record.”
The article continues, “Five
years after the financial crisis sent the fortunes of many in the
U.S. and around the world tumbling, the wealthiest as a group have
finally gained back all that they lost.” The question that came to
my mind, gained it back from who?
And then I saw the article
from the New
York Times, “Despite the addition of more than two million jobs
last year, soaring corporate profits and continuing economic growth,
income for the typical American household did not rise in 2012 and
poverty failed to fall, new data from the Census Bureau show.”
It is important to note that
these reports were released within days of one another. Perhaps after
learning that "The
400 wealthiest Americans are worth just over $2 trillion, roughly
equivalent to the GDP of Russia. That is a gain of $300 billion
from a year ago, and more than double a decade ago. The average net
worth of list members is a staggering $5 billion, $800 million more
than a year ago and also a record,” the Times felt a comparison
article was in order, or maybe it was just the timing of the Census
Bureau report.
The Times also reports,
“...economists believe that the report understates the degree of
income inequality in the United States, by not including, among other
things, earnings from capital gains made on rising stock prices.”
According to the very
informative section on methodology in the Forbes report, many
billionaires were left off the list because their fortunes are
dispersed among family members or their net worth, while over $1
billion, was not high enough for this particular study.
Reading these articles side
by side seems to confirm the growing awareness of the income gap
between the rich and the poor. I think it is worth noting that the
majority of high ranking billionaires made their fortunes in the
computer and information based industries. I have to ask, do the tax
code and patent laws favor these industries? Do the companies
providing jobs associated with these industries have more
responsibility to the public they are making so much money from? Can
the free market be trusted to “trickle down”? I also can't help
but think that these tech gurus should have invested more in the
public education that could support their industries in country.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/luisakroll/2013/09/16/inside-the-2013-forbes-400-facts-and-figures-on-americas-richest/
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/18/us/median-income-and-poverty-rate-hold-steady-census-bureau-finds.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=1
No comments:
Post a Comment