In response to the question, “What
makes this country the greatest in the world?” the answers
“diversity, opportunity, and freedom” are obvious answers that
are not specific to any one country and must be constantly defended
in court, Congress, and the press. The acknowledgment that our
country is no longer the greatest in the world indicates that our
Constitution and strives for democracy have done a lot for the global
effort to shift power into the hands of the people, fore today there
are many democracies. There was a time when our values were a beacon
for what new democracies ought to try to accomplish.
Something has changed since that time. Was it hubris or ignorance or greed that knocked us off the top? Is it possible to get back to that point? Is there even any room in an intellectual debate to argue who is the greatest or most evil? Words like evil and great are so very subjective. Perhaps there are great men and women striving to create great countries all over the world. If we make some changes we can get back on track to be included in the list of the greats of the 21st century, rather than be written off after the 20th.
But before that can happen we need
reforms. We need updates to our Constitution, there are new rights
and responsibilities that deserve the ultimate protection it can
offer. We need a more effective legislative branch; I don't think
anyone believes Congress is capable of guiding us to greatness. It is
getting harder and harder to find regular citizens who can identify
with either party. There are more and more laws being written every
day to restrict freedoms. Somehow freedom today means something
different depending on what party one belongs to. This kind of “good
versus evil” thinking prevents the broader debate from transcending
to the real issue, how do we make good better?
No comments:
Post a Comment