Critical thinking flaws in:
"The Rape 'Epidemic' Doesn't Actually Exist"
(By Caroline Kitchens)
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/economic-intelligence/2013/10/24/statistics-dont-back-up-claims-about-rape-culture
The writer introduces the topic
well with this reasonable description of the topic of her post:
A group of 100 protesters – including many topless women – recently marched the streets of Athens, Ohio chanting, "Blame the system, not the victim" and "Two, four, six, eight, stop the violence, stop the rape." Organized by an Ohio University student organization called "f*ckrapeculture," the protest was designed to bring attention to what the founders believe is a toxic culture of sexism and sexual violence infecting their campus.
Kitchens claims that the recent efforts of rape awareness activists
is, "...built on a foundation of dubious statistics and a distorted view
of masculinity." She offers no example or proof of what that
"distorted view of masculinity" is or how it is manifested. The link
the writer uses to offer evidence of dubious statistics was written in 1994 and
based on statistics from even earlier.
It would seem that the writer is picking and choosing what statistics
are valid with little method.
Kitchens claims that these certain statistics are
unreliable, "...primarily because of vague and expansive definitions of
what qualifies as sexual assault." The assertion ignores the widely known
fact that many sexual assaults go unreported, which would also skew the numbers.
The writer dismisses a poll from the Department of Justice that the activists
have used to support their efforts, but uses one of their (old) reports in the
very next paragraph.
At this point I am starting to wonder why Caroline Kitchens
is so tough on the universities who, " have recently reviewed and revised
their policies. " And claims, "It is not clear that these policies
have made campuses safer places for women, but they have certainly made them
treacherous places for falsely accused men." So I click on her profile and
find this is the only blog post. I have no evidence, but I suspect a troll.
The writer chooses to relay the story of the young man featured
in the post's only photo, but does not offer the anecdotes from the other
perspective. The case Kitchens chooses to profile was also not one where the
victim later recanted, which may have supported the argument more strongly. The
author lacks any statistical evidence of the frequency of false accusations.
I believe the writer began the article with a point to
prove, rather than a question to answer. This led to statistical cherry-picking
and an oversimplification about the plight rape awareness activists are
fighting. The author fails to prove the claim asserted in the title of the article.
No comments:
Post a Comment